Medieval understanding of physiology had an impact on attitudes to sex, just as much as did the teachings of the church. Though who knows how much it had an impact on everyday life. And something about how childbirth fitted into community life, and rearing the outcome.
149 Sex, Childbirth and Children
Just to warn you it's an episode with the odd explicit bit, I have to say. Just so you know.
10 thoughts on “149 Sex, Childbirth and Children”
At the risk of being pedantic, I think you may have erred in your presentation of the shift of English away from inflections. You say “…English had been a heavily inflected language, where the way you spoke a word had as great an impact on the meaning as the way it was written.”
Perhaps I’m misunderstanding what you’re saying here, but it sounds like you’re confused about what “inflected” means in this context. While it’s true that “inflection” today is used to refer to the way a word is spoken, that’s not what it means for a language to be “inflected”. An inflected language is one in which words have a long list of endings, or inflections, which are used to represent the grammatical role of a word in a sentence, as well as represent gender or whether something is singular or plural. In modern English, the “s” and “es” to represent plurals are inflections. The addition of “ed” to a verb to make it past tense is an inflection. English used to have a lot of these, like Latin. Inflections had to agree as well, so that an adjective’s inflection had to match that of the noun it was modifying.
Frankly, it’s a mess, and I’m glad English got rid of it. English is itself an awful mess, but at least we don’t have to worry about the gender of inanimate objects.
If you’d like to learn more, you cannot do better than Kevin Stroud’s “History of English Podcast”. Actually, I think the two of you should team up somehow. Maybe you could get him to do the word segment at the end of your show, and you could cover some bit of English history for his show.
Thanks for the correction Mike…I’ll try and put a brief word at the start of the next episode.
And, spookily, Kevin and I have already spoken! He’s got a couple of weekly words lined up for 3 week’s time…
Wonderful! I am looking forward to seeing what you and Mr. Stroud create.
Nice recording >Very informative.
Regarding Kevin Stroud’s “History of English” podcast, I’ve been listening to that in tandem with this excellent podcast, and I find the synergy between them wonderful. Learning about the political outcomes of invasion or occupation, and also learning about the linguistic outcomes, provides a much more nuanced view of the whole history of the times. I feel fortunate to have found two such wonderful podcasts, and podcasters.
Thank you everyone, I feel warm and fuzzy; which is a good thing I’m told! Yup, agree – Kevin’s podcast has helped me make my new Anglo Saxon England podcast better (I hope!).
Excellent episode. I posted this on my fb (could not figure out how to tag you) as shining example of how to bravely tackle unfamiliar intelectual territory!
it was painful, Ricardo. My comfort zone was many mile away in the distance
Somehow I missed the answer to the riddle. Where is it?
p.s. I’ve always been a bit delighted about the differences between English English and American English, and one of those is that we Americans would call the poem “risque” or “vulgar”, and you Brits would call it “a bit naughty” or “rude”. To us, “rude” means “impolite” without any hint of the sexually inappropriate. I don’t think I’ve ever heard it used by someone from the UK without an implication of innuendo.
Hi Zach, and I have a terrible memory, but I am going to guess that this riddle was the one about the Onion? May not have been, may have been the one about the key…hmm, let me know if one of those doesn’t unlock the riddle (arf, arf). Yes, rude is a tricky word for us too, because it can be both, which is thoroughly confusing. Context is all. Which is why social media can be so difficult!